HTMX vs React: Choosing the Right Tool for Your Project
Compare HTMX and React: when to use each, trade-offs, and real-world decision criteria for modern web development
HTMX vs React: Choosing the Right Tool
Both HTMX and React are excellent tools, but they solve different problems. Here's when to use each.
Key Differences
| Feature | HTMX | React |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Hypermedia/Server-driven | Component/Client-driven |
| Bundle Size | ~14KB | ~130KB (with React DOM) |
| Learning Curve | Hours | Weeks to months |
| State Management | Server-side | Client-side |
| SEO | Excellent | Good (with SSR) |
| Offline Support | Limited | Excellent |
| Real-time | Via SSE/WebSockets | Via WebSockets/libraries |
When to Choose HTMX
β Good for:
- Content-heavy sites (blogs, documentation)
- CRUD applications
- Admin panels
- Forms and data entry
- Teams with strong backend skills
- Projects prioritizing simplicity
Example: E-commerce admin panel
<table hx-get="/products" hx-trigger="load">
<!-- Product list loaded from server -->
</table>
When to Choose React
β Good for:
- Highly interactive UIs
- Complex client-side state
- Offline-first applications
- Real-time collaboration
- Mobile apps (React Native)
- Large teams with specialized frontend devs
Example: Real-time collaborative editor
function Editor() {
const [content, setContent] = useState('');
const [collaborators, setCollaborators] = useState([]);
// Complex client-side logic
useEffect(() => {
const ws = connectToCollaborationServer();
ws.on('change', handleRemoteChange);
// ...
}, []);
return <RichTextEditor value={content} />;
}
Comparison Scenarios
Scenario 1: Todo App
HTMX:
<form hx-post="/todos" hx-target="#list" hx-swap="beforeend">
<input name="title" />
<button>Add</button>
</form>
<ul id="list" hx-get="/todos" hx-trigger="load"></ul>
React:
function TodoApp() {
const [todos, setTodos] = useState([]);
const [input, setInput] = useState('');
const addTodo = async () => {
const response = await fetch('/api/todos', {
method: 'POST',
body: JSON.stringify({ title: input }),
});
const newTodo = await response.json();
setTodos([...todos, newTodo]);
};
return (
<div>
<input value={input} onChange={e => setInput(e.target.value)} />
<button onClick={addTodo}>Add</button>
<ul>
{todos.map(todo => <li key={todo.id}>{todo.title}</li>)}
</ul>
</div>
);
}
Winner: HTMX (simpler for this use case)
Scenario 2: Real-time Dashboard
HTMX:
<div hx-get="/dashboard/stats"
hx-trigger="every 5s"
hx-swap="innerHTML">
<!-- Stats updated every 5s -->
</div>
React:
function Dashboard() {
const [stats, setStats] = useState({});
useEffect(() => {
const ws = new WebSocket('ws://api/stats');
ws.onmessage = (event) => {
setStats(JSON.parse(event.data));
};
return () => ws.close();
}, []);
return <StatsDisplay stats={stats} />;
}
Winner: Depends on requirements (React better for complex real-time)
Hybrid Approach
You don't have to choose just one!
<!-- Use HTMX for simple interactions -->
<div hx-get="/users" hx-trigger="load">
Loading users...
</div>
<!-- Use React for complex components -->
<div id="chart-root"></div>
<script>
ReactDOM.render(<ComplexChart data={data} />, document.getElementById('chart-root'));
</script>
Decision Framework
Choose HTMX if:
- β Server-side rendering is natural for your stack
- β Team is stronger in backend than frontend
- β Simple, content-driven application
- β Want faster development time
- β Prioritize simplicity and maintainability
Choose React if:
- β Need complex client-side state
- β Building highly interactive UI
- β Offline functionality required
- β Large frontend team
- β Planning mobile app (React Native)
- β Need rich component ecosystem
Conclusion
HTMX and React aren't competitorsβthey solve different problems. HTMX excels at server-driven applications with simple interactivity. React excels at complex client-side applications.
Choose based on your project needs, not hype. Sometimes the simple tool is the right tool.
Jordan Patel
Web Developer & Technology Enthusiast